Why should reporters lie about being banned from covering Zahid’s daughter’s case? Apparently, the court ‘did not realise’ the presence of the media. Hogwash! Her case would have attracted journalists the way cow-pies attract flies. Law of the jungle prevails.

Why should reporters lie about being banned from covering Zahid’s daughter’s case? Apparently, the court ‘did not realise’ the presence of the media. Hogwash! Her case would have attracted journalists the way cow-pies attract flies. Law of the jungle prevails. - Hello loyal readers FeedGoogle, In the article you are reading this time with the title Why should reporters lie about being banned from covering Zahid’s daughter’s case? Apparently, the court ‘did not realise’ the presence of the media. Hogwash! Her case would have attracted journalists the way cow-pies attract flies. Law of the jungle prevails., We have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article Malaysians, what we write you can understand. Alright, happy reading.

By Mariam Mokhtar Why did the courts lie and say that reporters had not been stopped from covering former deputy prime minister, Zahid Hamidi‘s daughters’s trial?2. Why would reporters risk their reputations in this manner? 3. Why did theNational Union of Journalists Malaysia and the Media advocacy group Gerakan Media Merdeka (Geramm)also stake their reputations and demand to know why at least five reporters assigned to cover the couple’s charge for alleged breach of the movement control order were told to leave without any clear explanation? 4. So, why did the Federal Court Chief Registrar’s office say “…that the court “did not realise the presence of the media” in the court room yesterday….” Does the Chief registrar think we were born yesterday? A high-profile case of an arrogant, attention-seeking daughter of a man like Zahid, will attract reporters, the same way cow-pies attra…