Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy
Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy - Hello loyal readers FeedGoogle, In the article you are reading this time with the title Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy, We have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article Malaysians, what we write you can understand. Alright, happy reading.
Title : Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy
Category : Malaysians
I refer to Syahredzan Johan's article Revisiting the case of Nizar v Zambry. As the writer said, some may not agree with the decision of the Federal Court in Nizar v Zambry that the loss of confidence in the menteri besar of Perak may not only be established through a vote in the state legislative assembly but may also be gathered from other extraneous sources provided they are properly established. Such sources include representations made by members of the assembly that the MB no longer enjoys the support of the majority of the members of the House.In that case, there was a demonstration of support by 31 members of the assembly for BN. This clearly pointed to the loss of confidence of the majority of the members of the assembly in the leadership of the incumbent MB, even without a vote in the House.Put simply, the question of confidence in the prime minister may be deter…
That's the article Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy
You are now reading the article Nizar v Zambry not inconsistent with parliamentary democracy with link address https://feedgoogle.blogspot.com/2020/09/nizar-v-zambry-not-inconsistent-with.html