Judge did not err in SRC case, court told

4 min read

Judge did not err in SRC case, court told - Hello loyal readers FeedGoogle, In the article you are reading this time with the title Judge did not err in SRC case, court told, We have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article Malaysians, what we write you can understand. Alright, happy reading.



Title : Judge did not err in SRC case, court told
Category : Malaysians

Read also:


Judge did not err in SRC case, court told

PUTRAJAYA: The judge who convicted Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case did not err in law when he added more grounds in his written judgment compared to the verbal ruling he delivered in court earlier, the Court of Appeal heard.Ad hoc prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram said Section 182A of the Criminal Procedure Code gave the judge the right to do so. He said the law stated that the court must consider all evidence before it at the conclusion of the trial in order to decide whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt and not only the prima facie findings.“According to the defence, this is illegal, ” Sithambaram said, referring to the additional grounds of judgment. “But the law as it stands, shows the judge has every right, after giving an oral ruling, to add further grounds in his findings of his prima facie case. That is not ille…

PUTRAJAYA: The judge who convicted Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case did not err in law when he added more grounds in his written judgment compared to the verbal ruling he delivered in court earlier, the Court of Appeal heard.Ad hoc prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram said Section 182A of the Criminal Procedure Code gave the judge the right to do so. He said the law stated that the court must consider all evidence before it at the conclusion of the trial in order to decide whether the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt and not only the prima facie findings.“According to the defence, this is illegal, ” Sithambaram said, referring to the additional grounds of judgment. “But the law as it stands, shows the judge has every right, after giving an oral ruling, to add further grounds in his findings of his prima facie case. That is not ille…


That's the article Judge did not err in SRC case, court told

That's it for the article Judge did not err in SRC case, court told this time, hopefully can be useful for all of you. well, see you in another article post.


You are now reading the article Judge did not err in SRC case, court told with link address https://feedgoogle.blogspot.com/2021/04/judge-did-not-err-in-src-case-court-told.html