‘Inaccurate but good for now’

3 min read

‘Inaccurate but good for now’ - Hello loyal readers FeedGoogle, In the article you are reading this time with the title ‘Inaccurate but good for now’, We have prepared this article well for you to read and take information in it. hopefully the contents of the post Article Malaysians, what we write you can understand. Alright, happy reading.



Title : ‘Inaccurate but good for now’
Category : Malaysians

Read also:


‘Inaccurate but good for now’

PETALING JAYA: Non-contact infrared thermometers, also known as a “thermometer gun”, have become a familiar device when one enters any premises under the new norm since the Covid-19 outbreak. But health experts warned that these thermometers could give off inaccurate temperature readings. Universiti Malaya Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Faculty of Medicine Prof Dr Moy Foong Ming said detecting fever required measuring the body’s core temperature. She explained that detecting a feverish person via oral digital thermometers were the most accurate, followed by ear thermometers but acknowledged that these thermometers were not practical for mass screenings. “Thermal cameras and infrared thermometers are the next best alternatives,” she added.

Dr Moy explained that even if infrared thermometers could detect fever reliably, it could not prevent the spread of the coronavirus…

PETALING JAYA: Non-contact infrared thermometers, also known as a “thermometer gun”, have become a familiar device when one enters any premises under the new norm since the Covid-19 outbreak. But health experts warned that these thermometers could give off inaccurate temperature readings. Universiti Malaya Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Faculty of Medicine Prof Dr Moy Foong Ming said detecting fever required measuring the body’s core temperature. She explained that detecting a feverish person via oral digital thermometers were the most accurate, followed by ear thermometers but acknowledged that these thermometers were not practical for mass screenings. “Thermal cameras and infrared thermometers are the next best alternatives,” she added.

Dr Moy explained that even if infrared thermometers could detect fever reliably, it could not prevent the spread of the coronavirus…


That's the article ‘Inaccurate but good for now’

That's it for the article ‘Inaccurate but good for now’ this time, hopefully can be useful for all of you. well, see you in another article post.


You are now reading the article ‘Inaccurate but good for now’ with link address https://feedgoogle.blogspot.com/2020/07/inaccurate-but-good-for-now.html